CORRELATION OF SIDE EFFECTS DEVELOPMENT WITH USED OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE SOON AFTER REDUCTION MAMMOPLASTY
https://doi.org/10.35266/2949-3447-2024-3-3
Abstract
The aim of the study is to compare the results of reduction mammoplasty in 32 patients aged 20 to 45 years for the period from 2012 to 2023. In Group I (n = 16), we used an inferior pedicle flap with an average breast reduction volume of 2,004.5 ± 212.5 g and a removed tissue weight ranging from 580 to 4,020 g. In Group II (n = 16), we used a superomedial pedicle flap with a reduction volume of 1,824.7 ± 218.6 g and a tissue weight removed ranging from 460 to 3,200 g. The advantages of the superomedial pedicle technique are a shortened surgery time, preservation of vertical volume, a lower tendency to ptosis, efficiency and safety for widespread practice in order to preserve the blood supply to the vascular and areolar zone in patients with excess breast mass. This method is more suitable for mild and moderate hypertrophy, while reduction with the inferior pedicle is more suitable for large and giant sized mammary glands.
About the Author
M. S. Saidov
Republican Scientific Center of Cardiovascular Surgery, Dushanbe
Tajikistan
Tajikistan
Researcher of the Reconstructive Surgery Department
References
1. Мурадов Н. М., Сабазбеков Ч. С. Терапия болевого синдрома у пациенток после маммопластики // Вопросы реконструктивной и пластической хирургии. 2022. Т. 25, № 4. С. 109–114. https://doi.org/10.52581/1814-1471/83/12.
2. Wang A. T., Panayi A. C., Fischer S. et al. Patient-reported outcomes after reduction mammoplasty using BREAST-Q: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2023. Vol. 43, no. 4. P. 231–241.
3. Орлов А. А., Седышев С. Х., Абрамкина В. С. и др. Особенности кровоснабжения молочной железы в контексте редукционной маммопластики // Вопросы реконструктивной и пластической хирургии. 2021. Т. 24, № 3–4. С. 40–48. https://doi.org/10.52581/1814-1471/78/03.
4. Toplu G., Altınel D., Serin M. Evaluation of factors related to postoperative complications in patients who underwent reduction mammoplasty // European Journal of Breast Health. 2021. Vol. 17, no 2. P. 157–164. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh. galenos.2021.6336.
5. Теркулов А. А., Девликанова Е. Э., Колесников В. Е. Маммопластика: от реконструктивной до эстетической хирургии // Вестник Авиценны. 2022. Т. 24, № 4. С. 514–522.
6. Viscardi J. A., Oranges C. M., Schaefer D. J. et al. Reduction mammoplasty: a ten-year retrospective review of the omega resection pattern technique // Journal of clinical medicine. 2021. Vol. 10, no. 19. P. 4418. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194418.
7. Jørgensen M. G., Albertsdottir E., Dalaei F. et al. Age and body mass index affect patient satisfaction following reduction mammoplasty: a multicenter study using BREAST-Q // Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2021. Vol. 41, no. 6. P. 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa395.
8. Atiyeh B., Ghieh F., Chahine F. et al. Ptosis and bottoming out following mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty. Is synthetic mesh internal breast support the solution? A systematic review of the literature // Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2022. Vol. 46, no. 1. P. 1–10.
9. Божок А. А., Кораблева Н. П., Побережная А. В. и др. Особенности диагностики и лечения ювенильной гигантомастии // Детская медицина Северо-Запада. 2021. Т. 9, № 1. С. 59–60.
10. Derebaşınlıoğlu H., Nemmezi Karaca S., Aksoy O. The effect of dermal suspension on early complications after vertical reduction mammoplasty // Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2022. Vol. 46, no. 4. P. 1624–1638.
11. Liao C. D., Xia J., Zhao K. et al. Are surgical approaches correlated with BREAST-Q score improvements after reduction mammoplasty? A systematic review // Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2023. Vol. 90, no. 6S. P. S445–S446. https://doi.org/10.1097/ SAP.0000000000003445.
12. Talwar A. A., Copeland-Halperin L. R., Walsh L. R. et al. Outcomes of extended pedicle technique vs free nipple graft reduction mammoplasty for patients with gigantomastia // Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2023. Vol. 43, no. 2. P. 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjac258.
13. Côrrea M. D., Costa A. M. D., Côrrea L. D. et al. Assessment of the quality of life in patients with breast hypertrophy before and after reduction mammoplasty // Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica. 2023. No. 34. P. 204–209. https://doi.org/10.5935/2177-1235.2019RBCP0135.
14. Mian S., Dyson E., Ulbricht C. Reduction mammoplasty and back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis // European Spine Journal. 2020. No. 29. P. 497–502.
15. Каримова М. Н, Рахимов Н. М, Тугизова Д. И. и др. Редукционная маммопластика у женщин с выраженной гипертрофии молочных желез с использованием Т-образного разреза // Журнал вестник врача. 2021. Т. 1, № 2. С. 185–188. https://doi.org/10.38095/2181-466X-2021992-185-189.
16. Саидов М. С. Послеоперационные осложнения при редукционной маммопластик // Евразийский научно-медицинский журнал Сино. 2023. Т. 4, № 2. С. 47–58.
17. Саидов М. С. Применение шкалы Розенберга после операций на молочных железах в пластической хирургии // Евразийский научно-медицинский журнал Сино. 2021. Т. 2, № 3. С. 15–18.
Review
For citations:
Saidov M.S. CORRELATION OF SIDE EFFECTS DEVELOPMENT WITH USED OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE SOON AFTER REDUCTION MAMMOPLASTY. Vestnik SurGU. Meditsina. 2024;17(3):21-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35266/2949-3447-2024-3-3
Views:
111
Email this article 
