PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY IN DIFFUSE PERITONITIS TREATMENT
https://doi.org/10.35266/2949-3447-2025-2-8
Abstract
This work evaluates the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy in treating diffuse peritonitis. The treatment results of 130 patients with acute surgical pathology of abdominal cavity organs complicated by secondary diffuse peritonitis were analyzed by the authors. The authors evaluated postoperative lethality, morbidity, and the severity of postoperative complications, and analyzed the relaparotomies. Two groups of patients are analyzed. The main group (90 patients) received traditional debridement, while the control group (40 patients) received photodynamic therapy at the operation’s final stage. Postoperative lethality in the main group was statistically lower than in the control group (17.5% compared to 35.5%). Severe postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients in the main group (7.5%) and in 24 patients in the control group (26.6%). The analysis of relaparotomies revealed that the necessity to perform two or more relaparotomies in the main group amounted to 30% versus 53.3% in the control group. Photodynamic therapy included in the program of surgical treatment of patients with generalized secondary purulent peritonitis and sepsis has a significant antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory effect, which is indicated by a statistically faster relief of peritonitis clinical manifestations. The use of photodynamic therapy allows to reduce the severity of postoperative complications and lethality, which permits recommending it for clinical use.
About the Authors
V. V. Darvin
Surgut State University, Surgut
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Surgical Diseases Department
A. V. Volkivskiy
Surgut Regional Clinical Hospital, Surgut
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Surgeon, Oncologist
E. V. Bubovich
Surgut State University, Surgut
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Sciences (Medicine), Docent of Pathophysiology and General Pathology Department
G. A. Karimova
Surgut Regional Clinical Hospital, Surgut
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ultrasound Diagnostics Specialist
References
1. Клиническая хирургия : национал. руководство в 3 т. / под ред. B. C. Савельева, А. И. Кириенко. М. : ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2013. Т. 2. 832 с.
2. Острый перитонит : клинические рекомендации. 2017. URL: https://www.mrckb.ru/files/ostryj-peritonit.pdf (дата обращения: 10.04.2025).
3. Абакумов М. М., Багненко С. Ф., Белобородов В. Б. и др. Абдоминальная хирургическая инфекция : национал. рекомендации. 2011. URL: https://goo.su/fr748t (дата обращения: 10.04.2025).
4. Перитонит : практ. руководство / под ред. В. С. Савельев, Б. Р. Гельфанд, М. И. Филимонов. М. : Литтерра. 2006. 208 с.
5. Anaya D. A., Nathens A. B. Risk factors for severe sepsis in secondary peritonitis // Surgical Infections. 2003. Vol. 4, no. 4. Р. 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1089/109629603322761418.
6. Gauzit R., Péan Y., Barth X. et al. Epidemiology, management, and prognosis of secondary non-postoperative peritonitis: A French prospective observational multicenter study // Surgical Infections. 2009. Vol. 10, no. 2. Р. 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2007.092.
7. Sartelli M., Catena F., Ansaloni L. et al. Complicated intra-abdominal infections worldwide: The definitive data of the CIAOW study // World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2014. Vol. 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-9-37.
8. Ross J. T., Matthay M. A., Harris H. W. Secondary peritonitis: Principles of diagnosis and intervention // BMJ. 2018. Vol. 361. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1407.
9. Sartelli M., Catena F., Ansaloni L. et al. Complicated intra-abdominal infections in a worldwide context: An observational prospective study (CIAOW Study) // World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2013. Vol. 8, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-8-1.
10. Савельев В. С., Филимонов М. И., Гельфанд Б. Р. и др. Выбор режима этапного хирургического лечения распространенного перитонита // Анналы хирургии. 2009. № 4. С. 5–10.
11. Piroth L., Pechinot A., Minello A. et al. Bacterial epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance in ascitic fluid: A 2-year retrospective study // Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2009. Vol. 41, no. 11–12. P. 847–851. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365540903244535.
12. Шляпников С. А., Насер Н. Р., Батыршин И. М. Третичный перитонит и антибактериальная терапия: пути решения (аналитический обзор) // Клиническая и экспериментальная хирургия. Журнал имени акад. Б. В. Петровского. 2013. № 1. С. 47–53.
13. Patel V. C., Williams R. Antimicrobial resistance in chronic liver disease // Hepatology International. 2020. Vol. 14. P. 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-019-10004-1.
14. Schein M. Surgical management of intra-abdominal infection: Is there any evidence? // Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery. 2002. Vol. 387. Р. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-002-0276-z.
15. van Westreenen M., Mul F. J. P., Pronk A. et al. Influence of peroperative lavage solutions on peritoneal defence mechanisms in vitro // European Journal of Surgery. 1999. Vol. 165, no. 11. Р. 1066–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/110241599750007919.
16. Di Saverio S., Mandrioli M., Sibilio A. et al. A cost-effective technique for laparoscopic appendectomy: Outcomes and costs of a case–control prospective single-operator study of 112 unselected consecutive cases of complicated acute appendicitis // Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2014. Vol. 218, no. 3. Р. e51–e65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.003.
17. Koç T. R., Tarhan Ö. R., Sarıcık B. Effects of peritoneal lavage and dry cleaning on bacterial translocation in a model of peritonitis developed using cecal ligation and puncture // Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2018. Vol. 24, no. 4. Р. 281–286. https://doi.org/10.5505/tjtes.2017.97838.
18. Linder M. M., Wacha H., Feldmann U. et al. The Mannheim peritonitis index. An instrument for the intraoperative prognosis of peritonitis // Chirurg. 1987. Vol. 58, no. 2. Р. 84–92.
19. Tiwari M. M., Reynoso J. F., Tsang A. W. et al. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis // Annals of Surgery. 2011. Vol. 254, no. 6. Р. 927–932. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822aa8ea.
20. Мишутина О. Л., Волченкова Г. В., Ковалева Н. С. и др. Фотодинамическая терапия в стоматологии (обзор литературы) // Смоленский медицинский альманах. 2019. № 3. С. 102–111.
21. Пантелеев В. С. Антимикробная фотодинамическая терапии в сочетании с лазерной активацией антибиотиков у больных острым деструктивным панкреатитом // Креативная хирургия и онкология. 2011. № 2. С. 67–69.
22. Дарвин В. В., Онищенко С. В., Каримов И. М. и др. Результаты применения фотодинамической терапии в лечении больных распространенным перитонитом // Фундаментальные и прикладные проблемы здоровьесбережения человека на Севере : сб. материалов V Всеросс. науч.-практ. конф., 27 октября 2020 г., г. Сургут. Сургут : Сургутский государственный университет, 2020. С. 174–181.
Review
For citations:
Darvin V.V., Volkivskiy A.V., Bubovich E.V., Karimova G.A. PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY IN DIFFUSE PERITONITIS TREATMENT. Vestnik SurGU. Meditsina. 2025;18(2):60-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35266/2949-3447-2025-2-8
Views:
50
Email this article 
