THE ASSESSMENT OF WOMEN’S SATISFACTION IN USING A MENSTRUAL CUP
https://doi.org/10.34822/2304-9448-2021-4-64-69
Abstract
The study aims to assess the level of women’s satisfaction in using a menstrual cup during menstruation (in comparison with other means of feminine hygiene). Material and methods. 30 patients participated in the
study. The majority of women, 89.7 % (27), agreed to continue using the menstrual cup. However, 10.3 % (3) of women refused to use it afterwards due to the difficulties in use and unpleasant odor from the vagina. The results of the survey and bacterioscopical examination were compared before and after using the menstrual cup for 3 months. The package Microsoft Excel was used for statistical analysis. The Pearson’s Chi-squared test was used to compare the qualitative properties. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to examine the quantitative properties for the normality of distribution. The data with normality of distribution are shown as the arithmetic mean (M) and standard deviation (SD). The Wilcoxon test was used to carry out the comparative analysis of quantitative properties. The value of p < 0.05 was used as the level of the statistical significant difference. Results. An extraneous body in the vagina for 3–4 days can create preconditions for bacterial vaginosis formation, which should be considered while consulting the patients on the matter of suitable hygienic means.
About the Authors
T. A. OboskalovaRussian Federation
Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Professor, Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
M. V. Koval
Russian Federation
Candidate of Sciences (Medicine), Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
E-mail: marinakoval1203@gmail.com
A. T. Gainullina
Russian Federation
Student
References
1. Горпенко А. А. Применение менструальной чаши в качестве средства личной гигиены современной женщины // Проблемы современной науки и образования. 2017. № 22 (104). С. 80–83.
2. Розанова И. Е. История интимной гигиены // Гинекология. 2009. № 1. С. 21–26.
3. Уварова Е. В., Сальникова И. А. В ногу со временем: все о безопасности использования интравагинальных тампонов // Репродуктивное здоровье детей и подростков. 2008. № 6. С. 87–92.
4. Петухова Г. С., Черепнина А. Л., Медведева П. И. Влияние средств интимной гигиены на симптомы вагинального дискомфорта у женщин детородного возраста, в том числе у беременных женщин // Репродуктивное здоровье в Беларуси. 2009. № 4 (4). С. 60–75.
5. Балакина М. В. Средства женской гигиены: безопасность для здоровья и окружающей среды // Сырье и упаковка: для парфюмерии, косметики и бытовой химии. 2020. № S1 (225). С. 25–27.
6. Впитывающее изделие в виде трусов : пат. 2572777 Рос. Федерация. № 2013135304/12 ; заявл. 26.12.11 ; опубл. 20.01.16. Бюл. № 4. 2 с.
7. Van Eijk A. M., Zulaika G., Lenchner M. et al. Menstrual Cup Use, Leakage, Acceptability, Safety, and Availability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Lancet Public Health. 2019. Vol. 4, Is. 8. P. E376–E393.
8. Beksinska M. E., Smit J., Greener R., Todd C. S., Lee M. L., Maphumulo V., Hoffmann V. Acceptability and Performance of the Menstrual Cup in South Africa: A Randomized Crossover Trial Comparing the Menstrual Cup to Tampons or Sanitary Pads // J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015. Vol. 24, Is. 2. P. 151–158.
9. Huang P.-T., Huang J.-H. Menstrual Cup Use Intention and the Moderating Effects of Sexual Orientation and Gender Characteristic Among Female University Students in Taiwan: A Theory-Driven Exploration // Arch Sex Behav. 2020. Vol. 49, Is. 4. P. 1355–1366.
10. Nonfoux L., Chiaruzzi M., Badiou C. et al. Impact of Currently Marketed Tampons and Menstrual Cups on Staphylococcus Aureus Growth and Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin 1 Production In Vitro // Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018. Vol. 84, № 12. P. 351–418.
Review
For citations:
Oboskalova T.A., Koval M.V., Gainullina A.T. THE ASSESSMENT OF WOMEN’S SATISFACTION IN USING A MENSTRUAL CUP. Vestnik SurGU. Meditsina. 2021;(4 (50)):64-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34822/2304-9448-2021-4-64-69