COURSE OF PREGNANCY IN PATIENTS AFTER ORGAN-PRESERVING SURGERY FOR PLACENTA ACCRETA
https://doi.org/10.34822/2304-9448-2020-3-21-25
Abstract
The study aims to assess the course of pregnancy in patients with placenta accreta after uterine artery
embolization and intraoperative bleeding control. Material and methods. In the course of the work, a prospective multivariate analysis of 117 medical histories of pregnant women with a single child pregnancy that ended in childbirth or abortion is made. Group I (main) includes women (n = 106) with a singleton pregnancy, who had uterine artery embolization due to placenta accreta. Group II (n = 10) consists of women who in the postpartum period underwent surgical hemostasis without hysterectomy to stop bleeding. Reproductive function in women who underwent uterine artery embolization is studied. Results. Preparation for consecutive pregnancy in patients with a history of placenta accreta and uterine artery embolization allows preserving reproductive function without significant complications.
embolization and intraoperative bleeding control. Material and methods. In the course of the work, a prospective multivariate analysis of 117 medical histories of pregnant women with a single child pregnancy that ended in childbirth or abortion is made. Group I (main) includes women (n = 106) with a singleton pregnancy, who had uterine artery embolization due to placenta accreta. Group II (n = 10) consists of women who in the postpartum period underwent surgical hemostasis without hysterectomy to stop bleeding. Reproductive function in women who underwent uterine artery embolization is studied. Results. Preparation for consecutive pregnancy in patients with a history of placenta accreta and uterine artery embolization allows preserving reproductive function without significant complications.
About the Authors
R. N. Marchenko
Tyumen State Medical University,
Perinatal Center, Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Intensive Care with the
Course of Clinical and Laboratory Diagnostics,
Head, Obstetric Physiological Department No. 2
Е-mail: vrach08@rambler.ru
I. I. Kukarskaya
Tyumen State Medical University,
Perinatal Center, Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Professor of the Gynecology and Intensive Care with the
Course of Clinical and Laboratory Diagnostics,
Chief Obstetrician-Gynaecologist, Tyumen Region Health Department
Chief Medical Officer
References
1. Виницкий А. А., Шмаков Р. Г. Современные представления об
2. этиопатогенезе врастания плаценты и перспективы его прогнозирования молекулярными методами диагностики // Акушерство и гинекология. 2017. № 2. С. 5–10.
3. Maymon S., Maymon R., Bornstein J., Tovbin J., Melcer Y., Frank Wolf
4. M. Comparison of Two Approaches for Placenta Accreta: Uterine
5. Preservation versus Cesarean Hysterectomy // Harefuah. 2018.
6. № 157 (11). P. 696–700.
7. Carusi D. A. The Placenta Accreta Spectrum: Epidemiology and Risk
8. Factors // Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018. № 61 (4). P. 733–742.
9. Курцер М. А., Бреслав И. Ю., Григорян А. М., Кутакова Ю. Ю., Черепнина А. Л., Штабницкий А. М. Актуальные вопросы лечения
10. послеродовых кровотечений в акушерстве // Мед. алфавит.
11. № 1 (9). P. 14–17.
12. Шадрин Р. В., Шумова М. А., Кулик В. В., Назарян Г. С. Органосо-
13. храняющие операции у беременных с врастанием плаценты: наш опыт // Науч. вестник здравоохранения Кубани. 2017. № 2 (50). P. 108–116.
14. Олейникова О. Н. Оценка эффективности эмболизации маточ-
15. ных артерий при маточных кровотечениях различной этиологии // АГ-Инфо. 2009. № 2. С. 38–42.
16. Хасанов А. А. Диагностика, профилактика и органосохраняю-
17. щие методы родоразрешения беременных с врастанием плаценты // Казан. мед. журнал. 2016. № 97 (4). С. 477–485.
18. Reda A. Comments on: Conservative Surgical Treatment of a Case
19. of Placenta Accreta // Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018. № 40 (10). P. 654–655.
20. Huang L. L., Tang H., Awale R., Zeng Z. S., Li F. R., Chen Y. Antepartum
21. Embolization in Management of Labor Induction in Placenta Previa
22. // Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2013. № 40 (3). P. 454–456.
23. Lim H. J., Kim J. Y., Kim Y. D., Park J. Y., Hong J. S. Intraoperative
24. Uterine Artery Embolization without Fetal Radiation Exposure in
25. Patients with Placenta Previa Totalis: Two Case Reports // Obstet
26. Gynecol Sci. 2013. № 56 (1). P. 45–49.
27. Takeda A., Koike W. Conservative Endovascular Management of
28. Retained Placenta Accreta with Marked Vascularity after Abortion or
29. Delivery // Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017. № 296. P. 1189–1198.
30. Долгих Т. И., Пьянова Л. Г., Бакланова О. Н. Адсорбция цитокинов на поверхности модифицированного углеродного сорбента in vitro при перитоните // Общая реаниматология. 2009. № 6. С. 66–70.
31. Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
32. Consult Series #44: Management of Bleeding in the Late Preterm
33. Period. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) // Am J Obstet
34. Gynecol. 2018. № 218. P. B2–B8.
35. Орлов Ю. П., Долгих В. Т., Притыкина Т. В., Ершов А. В. Нарушен-
36. ный обмен железа как маркер тяжести состояния пациентов ре-
37. анимационного профиля // Физиология человека. 2007. № 33 (1).
38. С. 109–113.
39. Baldwin H. J., Patterson J. A., Nippita T. A., Torvaldsen S., Ibiebele I.,
40. Simpson J. M. et al. Antecedents of Abnormally Invasive Placenta in
41. Primiparous Women: Risk Associated with Gynecologic Procedures
42. // Obstet Gynecol. 2018. № 131. P. 227–233.
43. Lopez-Jimenez F. Rohde L. E., Luna-Jimenez M. A. Problems and
44. solutions in the interpretation of diagnostic tests // Rev Invest Clin.
45. Vol. 50, № 1. P. 65–72.
Review
For citations:
Marchenko R.N., Kukarskaya I.I. COURSE OF PREGNANCY IN PATIENTS AFTER ORGAN-PRESERVING SURGERY FOR PLACENTA ACCRETA. Vestnik SurGU. Meditsina. 2020;(3 (45)):21-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34822/2304-9448-2020-3-21-25
Views:
177
Email this article 
