EFFICACY ANALYSIS OF MODIFIED FIBER IN ENDOVENOUS LASER ABLATION
https://doi.org/10.34822/2304-9448-2020-1-39-44
Abstract
The aim of the study is to improve the results of endovenous laser ablation by increasing the laser exposure and eliminating carbonization and burning of the fiber to the vein. Material and methods. Fifty-nine patients with varicose veins of the lower extremities in the saphenous vein system have been randomly divided into two equal groups. One group underwent endovenous laser ablation with a Biolitec radial fiber, and the other group underwent endovenous laser ablation with a modified cylindrical fiber. The number of burnings of the fiber to the vein is estimated intraoperatively. In the postoperative period, ablation of the veins is evaluated at the first, 14th, 60th and 180th day, and the severity of pain during the first 14 days. Results. Аfter endovenous laser ablation, regardless of the type of fiber, complete ablation of all investigated veins is revealed in each observation period. The severity of pain after endovenous laser ablation with a modified fiber is statistically significantly lower at all periods of observation (p < 0.05). With endovenous laser ablation, the burning of the fiber to the vein is completely absent (p < 0.05).
About the Authors
R. M. Agalarov
Surgut State University,
Phlebology Centre “Antireflux”, Surgut, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate, Surgical Diseases Department,
Cardiovascular Surgeon;
E-mail: rmagalarov@mail.ru
K. V. Mazayshvili
Surgut State University,
Phlebology Centre “Antireflux”, Surgut, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor Of Sciences (Medicine), Professor of the Surgical Diseases Department,
Scientific Director;
E-mail: nmspl@mail.ru
References
1. The Japanese Society For Vascular Surgery Database Management Committee Member, Ncd Vascular Surgery Data Analysis Team. Vascular Surgery in Japan: 2012 Annual Report by the Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery // Ann Vasc Dis. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 260–279. DOI 10.3400/Avd. Ar.19-00030.
2. Malskat W. S. J., Engels L. K., Hollestein L. M., Nijsten T., van den Bos R. R. Commonly Used Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) Parameters Do Not Influence Efficacy: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019. Vol. 58. No. 2. P. 230–242. DOI 10.1016/J.Ejvs.2018.10.036.
3. Bozoglan O., Mese B., Inci M. F., Eroglu E. A Rare Complication of Endovenous Laser Ablation: Intravascular Laser Catheter Breakage // Case Reports. 2013. DOI 10.1136/bcr-2013-009012.
4. Селиверстов Е. И., Балашов А. В., Лебедев И. С., Ан Е. С.,
5. Солдатский Е. Ю. Случай фрагментации световода в большой подкожной вене после эндовенозной лазерной облитерации // Флебология. 2014. Т. 8, № 4. С. 55–58.
6. Мазайшвили К. В., Акимов С. С., Семкин В. Д., Ангелова В. А.
7. структура и особенности осложнений эндовенозной лазерной облитерации // Флебология. 2017. Т. 11, № 4. С. 212–217. DOI 10.17116/flebo2017114212-217.
8. Ahn M., Chae Y., Hwang J., Ahn Y., Kang H. W. Endoluminal
9. Application of Glass-Capped Diffuser for Ex Vivo Endovenous Photocoagulation // J Biophotonics. 2017. Vol. 10, No. 8. P. 997–1007. DOI 10.1002/Jbio.201500331.
10. Kansaku R., Sakakibara N., Amano A., Endo H., Shimabukuro T.,
11. Sueishi M. Histological Difference Between Pulsed Wave Laser and Continuous Wave Laser in Endovenous Laser Ablation // Phlebol J Venous Dis. 2015. Vol. 30, No. 6. P. 429–434. DOI 10.1177/0268355514538248.
Review
For citations:
Agalarov R.M., Mazayshvili K.V. EFFICACY ANALYSIS OF MODIFIED FIBER IN ENDOVENOUS LASER ABLATION. Vestnik SurGU. Meditsina. 2020;(1 (43)):39-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34822/2304-9448-2020-1-39-44
Views:
151
Email this article 
