Preview

Vestnik SurGU. Meditsina

Advanced search

PARAMETERS MONITORING OF QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS AFTER INGUINAL HERNIORRHAPHY

Abstract

The aim of the study is to evaluate the dynamics of the quality of life parameters of patients who underwent inguinal herniorrhaphy using totally extraperitoneal repair and trans abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair methods. Material and methods. A comparative analysis of the indicators of quality of life was carried out using the EQ-5D questionnaire on the 1st day, in 1 month and in 12 months after totally extraperitoneal repair (20
patients) and transabdominal preperitoneal repair (33 patients). Results. Maximum differences in the analyzed parameters appeared on the first-day post-surgery. Largely the presence of problems during this period, patients associated with pain or discomfort in the area of operation. The latter, first of all, manifested itself in the majority of those who underwent transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (64 %) and caused their lower health rating. The revealed differences abated within a month after the intervention and were absent in 12 months after surgery.

About the Authors

V. V. Darvin
Surgut State University
Russian Federation
Doctor of Science (Medicine), Professor, Head, Surgical Diseases Department, Medical Institute


A. N. Poborsky
Surgut State University
Russian Federation
Doctor of Science (Medicine), Professor, Medical Institute


N. I. Ponamarev
Surgut City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Medicine


Ш. D. Asutaev
Surgut State University, Surgut City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Postgraduate, Surgical Diseases Department, Medical Institute, Surgeon


References

1. Егиев В. Н., Воскресенский П. К. Грыжи. М. : Медпрактика-М, 2015. 480 с.

2. Bittner R., Montgomery M. A., Arregui M. E. et al. Update of Guidelines on Laparoscopic (TAPP) and Endoscopic (TEP) Treatment of Inguinal Hernia (International Endohernia Society) // Surg Endosc. 2015. Vol. 29. P. 289–321.

3. Miserez M., Peeters E., Aufenacker T. et al. Update with Level 1 Studies of the European Hernia SocietyGuidelines on the Treatment of Inguinal Hernia in Adult Patients // Hernia. 2014. Vol. 18 (2). P. 151–163.

4. Осмонбекова Н. С., Курбанов Ф. С., Добровольский С. Р. Значение и методика анализа качества жизни хирургических больных // Хирургия. Журн. им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2012. № 5. С. 84–87.

5. Poelman M. M., van den Heuvel B., Deelder J. D. EAES Consensus Development Conference on Endoscopic Repair of Groin Hernias // Surg Endosc. 2013. Vol. 27. P. 3505–3519.

6. Мизерницкий Ю. Л., Дартау Л. А. Управление здоровьем населения с позиций системного подхода // Вестник СурГУ. Медицина. 2017. № 2. С. 39–44.

7. Поборский А. Н., Дрожжин Е. В., Понамарев Н. И., Асутаев Ш. Д. Фармако-экономический анализ антибиотикотерапии осложнений после грыжесечения // Вестник СурГУ. Медицина. 2017. № 1. С. 59–61.

8. Руководство по исследованию качества жизни в медицине / под ред. Шевченко Ю. Л. М. : ЗАО «ОЛМА» Медиа Групп, 2007. 320 с.

9. Nyhus L. M. Individualization of Hernia Repair: a New Era // Surgery. 1993. Vol. 114 (1). P. 1–2.

10. Амирджанова В. Н., Эрдес Ш. Валидация русской версии общего опросника EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) // Науч.-практич. ревматология. 2007. № 3. С. 69–76. 11. EQ-5D: site. URL: https//euroqol.org/ (дата обращения: 20.01.2019).

11. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P. A. Classification of Surgical Complications. A New Proposal with Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey // Annals of Surgery. 2004. Vol. 240 (2). P. 205–213.

12. Inguinal Hernia Surgery / Ed. G. Campanelli. Milano: Springer-Verlag Mailand, 2017. 205 p.


Review

For citations:


Darvin V.V., Poborsky A.N., Ponamarev N.I., Asutaev D. PARAMETERS MONITORING OF QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS AFTER INGUINAL HERNIORRHAPHY. Vestnik SurGU. Meditsina. 2019;(2 (40)):57-62. (In Russ.)

Views: 141


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-3447 (Online)