PARAMETERS MONITORING OF QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS AFTER INGUINAL HERNIORRHAPHY
Abstract
patients) and transabdominal preperitoneal repair (33 patients). Results. Maximum differences in the analyzed parameters appeared on the first-day post-surgery. Largely the presence of problems during this period, patients associated with pain or discomfort in the area of operation. The latter, first of all, manifested itself in the majority of those who underwent transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (64 %) and caused their lower health rating. The revealed differences abated within a month after the intervention and were absent in 12 months after surgery.
About the Authors
V. V. DarvinRussian Federation
Doctor of Science (Medicine), Professor, Head, Surgical Diseases Department, Medical Institute
A. N. Poborsky
Russian Federation
Doctor of Science (Medicine), Professor, Medical Institute
N. I. Ponamarev
Russian Federation
Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Medicine
Ш. D. Asutaev
Russian Federation
Postgraduate, Surgical Diseases Department, Medical Institute, Surgeon
References
1. Егиев В. Н., Воскресенский П. К. Грыжи. М. : Медпрактика-М, 2015. 480 с.
2. Bittner R., Montgomery M. A., Arregui M. E. et al. Update of Guidelines on Laparoscopic (TAPP) and Endoscopic (TEP) Treatment of Inguinal Hernia (International Endohernia Society) // Surg Endosc. 2015. Vol. 29. P. 289–321.
3. Miserez M., Peeters E., Aufenacker T. et al. Update with Level 1 Studies of the European Hernia SocietyGuidelines on the Treatment of Inguinal Hernia in Adult Patients // Hernia. 2014. Vol. 18 (2). P. 151–163.
4. Осмонбекова Н. С., Курбанов Ф. С., Добровольский С. Р. Значение и методика анализа качества жизни хирургических больных // Хирургия. Журн. им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2012. № 5. С. 84–87.
5. Poelman M. M., van den Heuvel B., Deelder J. D. EAES Consensus Development Conference on Endoscopic Repair of Groin Hernias // Surg Endosc. 2013. Vol. 27. P. 3505–3519.
6. Мизерницкий Ю. Л., Дартау Л. А. Управление здоровьем населения с позиций системного подхода // Вестник СурГУ. Медицина. 2017. № 2. С. 39–44.
7. Поборский А. Н., Дрожжин Е. В., Понамарев Н. И., Асутаев Ш. Д. Фармако-экономический анализ антибиотикотерапии осложнений после грыжесечения // Вестник СурГУ. Медицина. 2017. № 1. С. 59–61.
8. Руководство по исследованию качества жизни в медицине / под ред. Шевченко Ю. Л. М. : ЗАО «ОЛМА» Медиа Групп, 2007. 320 с.
9. Nyhus L. M. Individualization of Hernia Repair: a New Era // Surgery. 1993. Vol. 114 (1). P. 1–2.
10. Амирджанова В. Н., Эрдес Ш. Валидация русской версии общего опросника EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) // Науч.-практич. ревматология. 2007. № 3. С. 69–76. 11. EQ-5D: site. URL: https//euroqol.org/ (дата обращения: 20.01.2019).
11. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P. A. Classification of Surgical Complications. A New Proposal with Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey // Annals of Surgery. 2004. Vol. 240 (2). P. 205–213.
12. Inguinal Hernia Surgery / Ed. G. Campanelli. Milano: Springer-Verlag Mailand, 2017. 205 p.
Review
For citations:
Darvin V.V., Poborsky A.N., Ponamarev N.I., Asutaev D. PARAMETERS MONITORING OF QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS AFTER INGUINAL HERNIORRHAPHY. Vestnik SurGU. Meditsina. 2019;(2 (40)):57-62. (In Russ.)