RELAPAROTOMY CASES AUDIT AFTER DELIVERY
Abstract
The aim of the study is to assess the reasons for relaparotomy after a cesarean section in order to improve medical care during operative delivery. Material and methods. Retrospective analysis of 27 cases resulting in relaparotomy after cesarean section in Surgut Regional Clinical Prenatal Centre is made. The analysis period is from January 2014 to June 2018. Results. The key reason for relaparotomy after the cesarean section was hypotonic postpartum hemorrhage (85.2 %). In 75 % of cases, hemorrhage began less than 6 hours after cesarean section, including 25 % within the first hour after the end of the operation. Plan of actions for medical staff at all stages of operative delivery is developed according to the analysis results. The effectiveness of these actions will be evaluated at the following stage of the research.
About the Authors
L. D. Belotserkovtseva
Surgut State University, Surgut Regional Clinical Prenatal Centre
Russian Federation
Doctor of Science (Medicine), Professor, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Head, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Medical Institute, Surgut Regional Clinical Prenatal Centre
Russian Federation
Doctor of Science (Medicine), Professor, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Head, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Medical Institute, Surgut Regional Clinical Prenatal Centre
S. E. Ivannikov
Surgut State University
Russian Federation
PhD (Medicine), Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Medical Institute
Russian Federation
PhD (Medicine), Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Medical Institute
M. T. Mirzozoda
Surgut State University
Russian Federation
Medical Resident, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Medical Institute
Russian Federation
Medical Resident, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Medical Institute
References
1. Agacayak E., Basaranoglu S., Tune S. Y. et al. A Comparison of Maternal Outcomes in Complicated Vaginal and Cesarean Deliveries // Clinical and
2. Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology 2017. No. 44 (1). Р. 20–26.
3. Shinar S., Hareuveni M., Ben-Tal O., Many A. Relaparotomies after Cesarean Sections: Risk Factors, Indications, and Management // J Perinat Med. 2013. No. 41. Р. 567–572.
4. Levitt L., Sapir H., Kabiri D., Ein-Mor E., Hochner-Celnikier D., Amsalem H. Relaparotomy Following Cesarean Delivery – Risk Factors and Outcomes // J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016. No. 29. Р. 607–609.
5. Септические осложнения в акушерстве: протокол лечения : клинич. рек. (утв. Обществом акушер. анестезиологов-реаниматологов и Рос. обществом акушеров-гинекологов 9, 10 января 2017 г.) : письмо Министерства здравоохранения РФ от 6 февраля 2017 г. № 15-4/10/2-728.
6. Всемирная организация здравоохранения. Рекомендации ВОЗ по профилактике и лечению послеродового кровотечения. Женева : ВОЗ, 2014. 41 с.
7. Rocha Filho E. A., Costa M. L., Cecatti J. G., Parpinelli M. A., Haddad S. M., Pacagnella R. C., Sousa M. H., Melo E. F. Jr. Severe Maternal Morbidity and Near Miss due to Postpartum Hemorrhage in a National Multicenter Surveillance Study // International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2015. No. 128 (2). Р. 131–136.
8. Norhayati M. N., Nik Hazlina N. H., Asrenee A. R., Sulaiman Z. The Experiences of Women with Maternal Near Miss and their Perception of Quality of Care in Kelantan, Malaysia: a qualitative study // BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017. No. 17. Р. 189.
9. Chandak P. O., Kedar K. V. Matermal Near Miss – a Review from Tertiary Care Hospital // Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-Jemds. 2017. No. 6 (47). Р. 3633–3637.
10. Профилактика, лечение и алгоритм ведения при акушерских кровотечениях (протокол лечения) : клинич. рек. : письмо М-ва здравоохранения РФ от 29 мая 2014 г. № 15-4/10/2-3881.
11. Баев О. Р., Вихарева О. Н., Шмаков Р. Г., Кан Н. Е., Клименченко Н. И. Пырегов А. В., Тетруашвили Н. К., Тютюнник В. Л., Федорова Т. А. Клинические рекомендации НЦАГиП Послеродовое кровотечение (краткий протокол) // Акушерство и гинекология. 2015. № 4. С. 3–9. URL: http://prof.ncagp.ru/upload/files/conf/ncagip22.pdf (дата обращения: 28.12.2018).
12. Белоцерковцева Л. Д., Коваленко Л. В., Киличева И. И., Иванников С. Е. Профилактика кровотечения карбетоцином при абдоминальном родоразрешении // Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2014. № 4. Р. 24–28.
13. Huras H., Radon-Pokracka M., Nowak M. Relaparotomy Following Cesarean Section − a Single Center Study // European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2018. No. 225. Р. 185–188.
14. Kessous R., Danor D., Weintraub Y. A., Wiznitzer A., Sergienko R., Ohell I., Sheiner E. Risk Factors for Relaparotomy after Cesarean Section // The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2012. No. 25 (11). Р. 2167–2170.
15. Akkurt M. O., Coşkun B., Güçlü T., Çift T., Korkmazer E. Risk Factors for Relaparotomy after Cesarean Delivery and Related Maternal Near-Miss Event due to Bleeding // J Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2018. Oct 21. DOI 10.1080/14767058.2018.1527309. [Epub ahead of print].
16. Иванников С. Е., Киличева И. И., Кравченко С. А. Факторы риска и причины послеродовых кровотечений более 1 000 мл, оценка лечебных и профилактических мероприятий // Вестник СурГУ. Медицина. 2014. № 4. Р. 40–44.
Review
For citations:
Belotserkovtseva L.D., Ivannikov S.E., Mirzozoda M.T. RELAPAROTOMY CASES AUDIT AFTER DELIVERY. Vestnik SurGU. Meditsina. 2019;(2 (40)):50-56. (In Russ.)
Views:
230
Email this article 
