Preview

Vestnik SurGU. Meditsina

Advanced search

EFFECT OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY ON VENOUS REFLUX VOLUMEIN PATIENTS WITH VARICOSE VEINS OF LOWER LIMBS

Abstract

The aim of the study is to assess the influence of changes in arterial inflow during exercise on quantitative parameters of reflux. Material and methods. The study included 61 patients with primary incompetence of the great saphenous vein. The diameter, cross-sectional area, average velocity, reflux time in seconds, were measured by duplex ultrasound. Reflux volume flow and reflux volume were calculated. The measurements were performed on standing patients at rest before physical exercise and 60 seconds after physical exercise (30 rising on toes at a frequency of 1 time per second). A decrease in the volume of reflux after exercise was calculated (DRV = RV (after) – RV (before)/RV (before)*100 %.). Automatic distal compression-decompression (120 mm Hg) was used as a provocation maneuver. The median and interquartile range were used for describing quantity parameters. Results. Before exercise, reflux parameters were: RT = 4.85 (3.71–6.00) sec; Q = 3.89 (2.03–5.81) ml/s; RV = 17.05 (10.32–25.34) ml. After physical exercise parameters change to RT = 2.86 (2.14–3.33) sec (p < 0,0001); Q = 3.61 (2.06–6.37) ml/s (p = 0,9981); RV = 10.07 (6.08–16.48) ml (p = 0,0007). By comparison of “before” and “after” parameters the reflux volume after the exercise was -40,9 %. Correlation analysis identified statistically significant inverse correlation between the diameter of the great saphenous vein and reflux volume after the exercise (-0,56 (p < 0,05)), as well as an inverse correlation between DRV and disease severity (VCSS) (r = -0.41 (p < 0.0001)).

About the Authors

R. A. Tauraginskii
Phlebology Centre “Antireflux”, Surgut
Russian Federation
Cardio-vascular Surgeon, Phlebologist


F. Lurie
Jobst Vascular Institute, Toledo, OH, USA; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
United States
MD, PhD, RPVI, RVT, FSVS, Associate Director, Adjunct
Research Professor, Division of Vascular Surgery


S. S. Simakov
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny
Russian Federation
PhD (Physics and Mathematics), Associate Professor, Department of Computational Physics


D. A. Borsuk
Clinic of Phlebology and Laser Surgery “Vasculab” Ltd., Chelyabinsk
Russian Federation
PhD (Medicine), Cardio-vascular Surgeon, Phlebologist


L. V. Kovalenko
Surgut State University
Russian Federation
Doctor of Science (Medicine), Professor, Director, Medical Institute


K. V. Mazayshvili
Surgut State University, Phlebology Centre “Antireflux”, Surgut
Russian Federation
Doctor of Science (Medicine), Associate Professor, Professor, Surgical Diseases Department, Medical Institute, Academic Supervisor


References

1. Lee B. B., Nicolaides A. N., Myers K., Meissner M., Kalodiki E., Allegra C. et al. Venous Hemodynamic Changes in Lower Limb Venous Disease: The UIP Consensus According to Scientific Evidence // Int Angiol. 2016. No. 35 (3) P. 236–352.

2. Paolini D. J., Comerota A. J., Jones L. S. Lower Extremity

3. Arterial Inflow is Adversely Affected in Patients with Venous Disease // J Vasc Surg. 2008. No. 48 (4). Р. 960–964. DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.05.058.

4. Nådland I. H., Wesche J., Sheriff D. D., Toska K. Does Venous Insufficiency Impair the Exercise-Induced rise in Arterial leg Blood Flow? // Phlebology. 2011. No. 26 (8). Р. 326–331. DOI 10.1258/phleb.2011.010092.

5. Labropoulos N., Tiongson J., Pryor L., Tassiopoulos A. K., Kang S. S., Mansour M. A., et al. Definition of Venous Reflux in Lower-Extremity Veins // J Vasc Surg. 2003. No. 38 (4). Р. 793–798. DOI 10.1016/S0741- 5214(03)00424-5.

6. Van Bemmelen P. S., Bedford G., Beach K., Strandness D. E. Quantitative Segmental Evaluation of Venous Valvular Reflux with Duplex Ultrasound Scanning // J Vasc Surg. 1989. No. 10 (4). Р. 425–431. DOI 10.1016/0741-5214(89)90417-5.

7. Nielsen H. V. Effect of Vein Pump Activation upon Muscle Blood Flow and Venous Pressure in the Human Leg // Acta Physiol Scand. 1982. No. 114 (4). Р. 481–485. DOI 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1982.tb07015.x.

8. Broholm R., Kreiner S., Bækgaard N., Panduro Jensen L., Sillesen H. Observer Agreement of Lower Limb Venous Reflux Assessed by Duplex Ultrasound Scanning using Manual and Pneumatic Cuff Compression in Patients with Chronic Venous Disease and Controls // Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011. No. 41 (5). Р. 704–710. DOI 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.01.014.

9. Ludbrook J. The Musculovenous Pumps of the Human Lower Limb // Am Heart J. 1966. No. 71(5). Р. 635–641. DOI 10.1016/0002-8703(66)90313-9.

10. Engelhorn C. Relationship Between Reflux and Greater Saphenous Vein Diameter // J Vasc Technol. 1997. No. 21 (3). Р. 167–172.

11. Navarro T. P., Delis K. T., Ribeiro A. P. Clinical and

12. Hemodynamic Significance of the Greater Saphenous Vein Diameter in Chronic Venous Insufficiency // Arch Surg. 2002. No. 137. Р. 1233–1237. DOI 10.1001/ archsurg.137.11.1233.

13. Raju S., Ward M., Jones T. L. Quantifying Saphenous

14. Reflux // J Vasc Surg. Venous Lymphat Disord. 2015. No. 3 (1). Р. 8–17. DOI 10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.07.005.

15. Christopoulos D., Nicolaides A. N., Szendro G. Venous

16. Reflux: Quantification and Correlation with the Clinical Severity of Chronic Venous Disease // Br J Surg. 1988. No. 75 (4). Р. 352–356.

17. Christopoulos D. C., Nicolaides A. N., Belcaro G., Kalodiki

18. E. Venous Hypertensive Microangiopathy in Relation to Clinical Severity and Effect of Elastic Compression // J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1991. No. 17 (10). Р. 809–813. DOI 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1991.tb03264.x.

19. Shiraishi Y. Relationship between Arterial Inflow Rate and Venous Filling Index of the Lower Extremities Assessed by Air Plethysmography in Subjects with or without Axial Reflux in the Great Saphenous Vein // Ann Vasc Dis. 2014. No. 7 (3). Р. 306–311. DOI 10.3400/ avd.oa.14-00028.

20. Bjordal R. I. Blood Circulation in Varicose Veins of the

21. Lower Extremities // Angiology. 1972. No. 23 (3). Р. 163–173. DOI 10.1177/000331977202300305.

22. Bjordal R. Flow and Pressure Studies in Venous Insufficiency // Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1988. No. 544. Р. 30–33.

23. Labropoulos N., Tassiopoulos A. K., Bhatti A. F., Leon

24. L. Development of Reflux in the Perforator Veins in Limbs with Primary Venous Disease // J Vasc Surg. 2006. No. 43 (3). Р. 558–562. DOI 10.1016/j. jvs.2005.11.046.

25. Recek C. Competent and Incompetent Calf Perforators in Primary Varicose Veins: a Resistant Myth // Phlebology. 2016. Р. 532–540. DOI 10.1177/0268355515610041.

26. Ludbrook J., Loughlin J. Regulation of Volume in Postarteriolar Vessels of the Lower limb // Am Heart J. 1964. No. 67 (4). Р. 493–507. DOI 10.1016/0002- 8703(64)90096-1.

27. Schmidt R. F., Thews G. Human Physiology. Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Hong Kong: Springer-Verlag GmbH, 1989.

28. Caro C. G., Pedley T. J., Schroter R. C., Seed W. A., Parker K. H. The Mechanics of the Circulation, second edition. 2011.

29. Henriksen O, Sejrsen P. Local Reflex in Microcirculation in

30. Human Skeletal Muscle // Acta Physiol Scand. 1977. No. 99 (1). Р. 19–26. DOI 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1977.tb10347.x.

31. Skagen K., Bonde‐Petersen F. Regulation of Subcutaneous Blood Flow during Head‐up Tilt (45°) in Normal // Acta Physiol Scand. 1982. No. 14 (1). Р. 31–35. DOI 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1982.tb06948.x.

32. Imadojemu V. A., Lott M. E., Gleeson K., Hogeman C. S., Ray C. A., Sinoway L. I. Contribution of Perfusion Pressure to Vascular Resistance Response during Head-up tilt // Am J Physiol Hear Circ Physiol. 2001. No. 281 (1). Р. H371–H375.

33. Sheriff D. D., Nadland I. H., Toska K. Hemodynamic

34. Consequences of Rapid Changes in Posture in Humans // J Appl Physiol. 2007. No. 103 (2). Р. 452–458. DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.01190.2006.

35. Sheriff D. D., Nådland I. H., Toska K. Role of Sympathetic

36. Responses on the Hemodynamic Consequences of Rapid Changes in Posture in Humans // J Appl Physiol 2010. No. 108 (3). Р. 523–532. DOI 10.1152/ japplphysiol.01185.2009.

37. Engelberger R. P., Keo H. H., Blaettler W., Fahrni J., Baumann F., Diehm N. et al. The Impact of Orthostatic Challenge on Arteriovenous Hemodynamics and Volume Changes of the Lower Extremity // J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018. No. 1 (3). Р. 250–256. DOI 10.1016/j.jvsv.2012.12.001.

38. Joyner M. J., Casey D. P. Regulation of Increased Blood Flow (Hyperemia) to Muscles During Exercise: A Hierarchy of Competing Physiological Needs // Physiol Rev 2015. No. 95 (2). Р. 549–601. DOI 10.1152/ physrev.00035.2013.

39. Nadland I. H., Walloe L., Toska K. Effect of the Leg Muscle Pump on the Rise in Muscle Perfusion During Muscle Work in Humans // Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009. No. 105 (6). Р. 829–841. DOI 10.1007/s00421-008-0965-6.

40. Nielsen H. V., Staberg B., Nielsen K., Sejrsen P. Effects of

41. Dynamic Leg Exercise on Subcutaneous Blood Flow Rate in the Lower Limb of Man // Acta Physiol Scand. 1988. No. 134 (4). Р. 513–518. DOI 10.1111/j.1365-201X.1988.tb10629.x.

42. Stooker W., Gök M., Sipkema P., Niessen H. W. M.,

43. Baidoshvili A., Westerhof N., et al. Pressure-Diameter Relationship in the Human Greater Saphenous Vein // Ann Thorac Surg. 2003. P. 1533-1538. DOI 10.1016/ S0003-4975(03)00896-8.

44. Katz A. I., Chen Y., Moreno A. H. Flow through a Collapsible Tube: Experimental Analysis and Mathematical Model // Biophys J. 1969. DOI 10.1016/ S0006-3495(69)86451-9.


Review

For citations:


Tauraginskii R.A., Lurie F., Simakov S.S., Borsuk D.A., Kovalenko L.V., Mazayshvili K.V. EFFECT OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY ON VENOUS REFLUX VOLUMEIN PATIENTS WITH VARICOSE VEINS OF LOWER LIMBS. Vestnik SurGU. Meditsina. 2019;(2 (40)):12-18.

Views: 332


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-3447 (Online)