CHRONIC OCCLUSION ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF CORONARY ARTERIES IN MULTIVESSEL CORONARY LESIONS
Abstract
In the review current scientific literature on the status of the problem of chronic occlusion endovascular treatment of coronary arteries in multivessel coronary lesions is presented. The results of studies conducted in the past 15 years, including a systematic review and meta-analysis, are shown. The main indications of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic total occlusion and its effectiveness are described.
About the Authors
L. S. Kalugina
Regional Cardiologic Dispensary, Centre for Diagnostics and Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. I. Gorkov
Regional Cardiologic Dispensary, Centre for Diagnostics and Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. A. Urvantseva
Surgut State University; Regional Cardiologic Dispensary, Centre for Diagnostics and Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Mario C., di,. Werner G. S. et al. European perspective in the recanalisation of Chronic Total Occlusions (CTO): consensus document from the EuroCTO Club // Euro Intervention. 2007. № 3 (1). P. 30-43
2. Booth J., Clayton T. et al. Randomized, controlled trial of coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: six-year follow-up from the Stent or Surgery Trial (SoS) // Circulation. 2008. № 118 (4). Р. 381-388.
3. Mohr F. W., Morice M. C. et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial // Lancet. 2013. № 381 (9867). Р. 629-638.
4. Бабунашвили А. М., Иванов В. А. Хронические окклюзии коронарных артерий: анатомия, патофизиология, эндоваскулярное лечение. М., 2012.
5. Levine G. N., Bates E. R. et al. ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions // J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011. № 58 (24). Р. 44-122.
6. Garcia S., Abdullah S. et al. Chronic total occlusions: patient selection and overview of advanced techniques // Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013. № 15 (2). Р. 334.
7. Zellweger M. J., Pfisterer M. E. Therapeutic strategies in patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease // Cardiovasc Ther. 2011. № 29. (6). Р. 23-30.
8. Joyal D., Afilalo J. et al. Effectiveness of recanalization of chronic total occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Am Heart J. 2010. № 160 (1). Р. 179-187.
9. Hochman J. S., Lamas G. A. et al. Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction // N Engl J Med. 2006. № 355 (23). Р. 2395-2407.
10. Soliman O. l., Kirschbaum S. W. et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of quantitation of left ventricular by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance // Am J Cardiol Sep. 2008. 102 (6). Р. 778-783.
11. Safley D. M., House J. A. et al. Improvement in survival following successful percutaneous coronary intervention of coronary chronic total occlusions: variability by target vessel // JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008. № 1. (3). Р. 295-302.
12. Patel V. G., Brayton K. M. et al. Angiographic success and procedural complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: a weighted meta-analysis of 18,061 patients from 65 studies // JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. № 6 (2). Р. 128-136.
13. Booth J., Clayton T. et al. Randomized, controlled trial of coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: six-year follow-up from the Stent or Surgery Trial (SoS) // Circulation. 2008. № 118 (4). Р. 381-388.
14. Hueb W., Lopes N. et al. Ten-year follow-up survival of the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II): a randomized controlled clinical trial of 3 therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease. 2010. Circulation. № 122 (10). Р. 949-957.
15. Wijns W., Kolh P. et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization // Eur Heart J. № 31 (20). Р. 2501-2555.
16. Nakamura S., Muthusamy T. S., Bae J. H. et. al. Impact of sirolimus-eluting stent on the outcome of patients with chronic total occlusions // Am J Cardiol. 2005. Vol. 95. Р. 161-166.
17. Werner G. S., Krack А., Schwarz G. et al. Prevention of lesion recurrence in chronic total coronary occlusions by paclitaxel-eluting stents // J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004. Vol. 44. Р. 2301-2306.
18. Осиев А. Г., Бирюков А. В., Редькин Д. А. и др. Методика коронарной петли без проведения антеградного проводника при ретроградной реканализации коронарных артерий // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2009. № 3. С. 59-62.
19. Байструков В. И., Осиев А. Г., Мироненко С. П. Окклюзионные бифуркационные поражения артерий в клинической практике интервенционного кардиолога // Медицина и образование в Сибири. 2013. № 4.
Review
For citations:
Kalugina L.S., Gorkov A.I., Urvantseva I.A. CHRONIC OCCLUSION ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF CORONARY ARTERIES IN MULTIVESSEL CORONARY LESIONS. Vestnik SurGU. Meditsina. 2016;(2 (28)):13-16. (In Russ.)
Views:
173
Email this article 
